As a vertical SaaS company launching (or re-launching) embedded payments, choosing the right pricing model for your payments product is critical. The pricing model will impact how easy or hard it is to sell payments, how many customers sign up for payments, the amount of payment volume they actually process through your platform, and the overall profitability of your payments product.
This article will explain the three most common pricing models for embedded payments, and how to choose the right model for your product.
Interchange plus pricing is where you pass the actual processing cost on to your customers, plus a buy-rate. This model is also known as IC+, cost plus, or passthrough-plus.
Interchange plus pricing will usually be described as a buy rate. For example, a buy rate of 40 bps + $0.30 means that the merchant will pay passthrough cost, plus 40 basis points, plus $0.30 per transaction.
Passthrough cost includes interchange fees determined by the networks and paid to the issuing banks, plus dues, fees and assessments (DFA) paid to the card networks. It does not include your payment provider fees, so your payment provider fees need to be considered when determining the buy-rate. If your cost is passthrough + 20 bps and you want a margin of 25 bps, you’d set your price at passthrough + 45 bps.
Interchange plus has certain benefits:
However, this model can also create several challenges for platforms:
For these reasons, interchange plus is not the optimal pricing model for most vertical SaaS platforms.
Flat pricing is what most merchants are familiar with. This model is also called blended pricing because card processing fees and markup are all blended into a single price.
The flat or blended price usually includes a percentage and per item fee, e.g. 2.9% + $0.30. It’s also possible to have just a percentage, e.g. 3.2%
Flat pricing has the benefits of simplicity and predictability:
Flat pricing has a few tradeoffs as well:
Flat pricing is a popular pricing model for vertical SaaS platforms and for many platforms it’s the optimal choice.
The third option takes the concept of a blended price one step farther.
Bundled pricing is similar to flat pricing, but the SaaS fee is also included. For example, instead of charging $99 per user per month plus 3% on payments, the platform might charge 5% on payments and the core SaaS product would be included.
This strategy has all the benefits of flat pricing:
Bundled pricing can also have advantages over flat pricing:
Bundled pricing works well where payments is integral to the core SaaS product and it’s impossible (or very rare) to use the core SaaS product without also using the embedded payments capability.
For most platforms, the optimal pricing model will be flat or bundled. If payments is essential to the core SaaS product, bundled pricing is an opportunity to simplify billing while protecting or increasing margins. If some merchants tend to use the core SaaS product without using payments, flat pricing is likely the right choice.
Interchange passthrough isn’t ideal for most vertical SaaS platforms because one of the core value props of vertical SaaS is ease of use, and interchange passthrough is the opposite of user-friendly. Costs will vary between transactions. Passing the exact processing fees on to customers adds complexity, which isn’t in the best interest of your customers.
In contrast, a clear volume fee and per-item fee will be consistent across all transactions and make it easier for your customers to understand their payment activity and processing fees. Flat and bundled pricing both offer this clarity and, for most SaaS platforms, these pricing models will provide the best merchant experience.
Looking for expert pricing and go-to-market strategies for embedded payments?
Get payments strategy secrets from our team of consulting alums in the free Embedded payments pricing guide for vertical SaaS platforms.
You'll find:
Be the first to hear about new content